|
76%
realme Narzo 50 5G
₹11,299
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
POCO X4 Pro
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 50 5G vs POCO X4 Pro
Comparing the realme Narzo 50 5G vs POCO X4 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO X4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,988, while realme Narzo 50 5G scores 1,796, making POCO X4 Pro the better performer.
Display: POCO X4 Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while realme Narzo 50 5G offers 6.6 inches, making POCO X4 Pro the larger display of the two. POCO X4 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to realme Narzo 50 5G's IPS LCD, making POCO X4 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO X4 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while realme Narzo 50 5G offers 48 MP, making POCO X4 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO X4 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme Narzo 50 5G offers 8 MP, making POCO X4 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme Narzo 50 5G delivers longer battery life with 17h 15m, while POCO X4 Pro delivers 16h 56m, making realme Narzo 50 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 50 5G and POCO X4 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: POCO X4 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 7.4 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo 50 5G is rated 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 50 5G and POCO X4 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
realme Narzo 50 5G
₹11,299
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO X4 Pro
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
24 May, 2022
|
05 Apr, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 810
|
Snapdragon 695
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Dart Charging
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.4/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(5,982 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(94,011 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
388,714
AnTuTu Score
|
393,322
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 15m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 24, 2022
(Official)
|
Apr 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 619
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
388,714
|
393,322
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 %
|
29.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
600 nits
|
1200 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.49 %
|
86.01 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.7 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
163.8 mm
|
164.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
205 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KGW3 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Dart Charging 50% in 31 minutes
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 41 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 15m
|
16h 56m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 2m 27s
|
0h 42m 47s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.169 W/kg Body: 1.189 W/kg
|
Head: 0.861 W/kg Body: 0.583 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|