|
77%
realme Narzo 70x 5G
₹11,299
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
POCO C85 5G
₹14,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 70x 5G vs POCO C85 5G
Comparing the realme Narzo 70x 5G vs POCO C85 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO C85 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,947, while realme Narzo 70x 5G scores 1,898, making POCO C85 5G the better performer.
Display: POCO C85 5G offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while realme Narzo 70x 5G offers 6.72 inches, making POCO C85 5G the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 70x 5G and POCO C85 5G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both realme Narzo 70x 5G and POCO C85 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 70x 5G and POCO C85 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO C85 5G delivers longer battery life with 15h 19m, while realme Narzo 70x 5G delivers 14h 19m, making POCO C85 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 70x 5G and POCO C85 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: POCO C85 5G receives a higher expert rating of 7.8 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo 70x 5G is rated 7.5.
User Rating: realme Narzo 70x 5G receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while POCO C85 5G has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
realme Narzo 70x 5G
₹11,299
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO C85 5G
₹14,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
24 Apr, 2024
|
16 Dec, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
45W Super VOOC Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
7.8/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(1,874 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(1,904 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
404,437
AnTuTu Score
|
553,034
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹14,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 24, 2024
(Official)
|
Dec 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v14
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
404,437
|
553,034
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
9.1 %
|
13.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
950 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
950 nits
|
810 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
392 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.51 %
|
81.85 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.40 %
|
81.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.6 mm
|
173.16 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
81.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.69 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
211 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
3072 x 4080 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 45W Super VOOC Charging 50% in 31 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 19m
|
15h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 4m 57s
|
1h 7m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.797 W/kg Body: 0.796 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹14,999
|