|
84%
realme Narzo 80 Pro
₹21,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 80 Pro vs iQOO Z11x
Comparing the realme Narzo 80 Pro vs iQOO Z11x across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 80 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,928, while iQOO Z11x scores 2,826, making realme Narzo 80 Pro the better performer.
Display: iQOO Z11x offers a screen size of 6.76 inches, while realme Narzo 80 Pro offers 6.7 inches, making iQOO Z11x the larger display of the two. realme Narzo 80 Pro features a OLED display compared to iQOO Z11x's LCD, making realme Narzo 80 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both realme Narzo 80 Pro and iQOO Z11x feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: iQOO Z11x offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while realme Narzo 80 Pro offers 16 MP, making iQOO Z11x better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Z11x delivers longer battery life with 19h 59m, while realme Narzo 80 Pro delivers 11h 50m, making iQOO Z11x the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 80 Pro and iQOO Z11x offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: iQOO Z11x receives a higher expert rating of 8.3 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo 80 Pro is rated 7.7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 80 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while iQOO Z11x has a rating of 4.2.
|
realme Narzo 80 Pro
₹21,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
84%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
09 Apr, 2025
|
16 Mar, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.76 inches (17.17 cm)
|
|
OLED
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2344 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
7200 mAh
|
|
80W Super VOOC Charging
|
44W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.7/10
|
8.3/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(4,536 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(1,351 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
711,323
AnTuTu Score
|
960,651
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 59m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Year
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
4 Year
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
Mali-G615 MP2
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
711,323
|
960,651
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
1,013
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
8.5 %
|
27.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
OLED (Curved Display)
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.76 inches (17.17 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2344 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
4500 nits
|
N/A
|
HBM Brightness
|
1400 nits
|
1200 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
392 ppi
|
382 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
88.88 %
|
85.64 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
93.7 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
162.75 mm
|
166.64 mm
|
Width
|
74.92 mm
|
78.43 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.55 mm
|
8.39 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
219 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 IP66 IP69
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera20x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view26 mm focal length 1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.828 mm focal length IMX852 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera22 mm focal length |
2 MP
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8192 x 6144 Pixels
|
3072 x 4096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
20 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @240 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera28 mm focal length |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
7200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Silicon Carbon
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 80W Super VOOC Charging 50% in 21 minutes
|
Yes 44W 50% in 43 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 50m
|
19h 59m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 50m 0s
|
1h 16m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28B
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/e/g/n/ac/be)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme P4
realme Narzo 80 Pro
iQOO Z10R
realme Narzo 80 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme P3 Pro
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme P4x
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme Narzo 90
realme Narzo 80 Pro
POCO X7
realme Narzo 80 Pro
iQOO Z10
realme Narzo 80 Pro
vivo T5x
realme Narzo 80 Pro
vivo T4
realme Narzo 80 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
realme Narzo 80 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M56 5G
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme GT 7T
realme Narzo 80 Pro
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
realme Narzo 80 Pro
vivo T4R
iQOO Z11x
vivo T5x
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Z10R
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Z11 5G
iQOO Z11x
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
iQOO Z11x
OnePlus N6 5G
iQOO Z11x
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Z10
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Neo 10R
iQOO Z11x
realme P4x
iQOO Z11x
realme P4
iQOO Z11x
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
iQOO Z11x
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
iQOO Z11x
iQOO Z10x
iQOO Z11x
OPPO K13 5G
iQOO Z11x
Moto G67 Power