|
77%
realme P3x 8GB RAM
₹18,499
|
80%
vivo T4X 8GB RAM
₹18,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme P3x 8GB RAM vs vivo T4X 8GB RAM
Comparing the realme P3x 8GB RAM vs vivo T4X 8GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both realme P3x 8GB RAM and vivo T4X 8GB RAM run at the same processing speed of 2.5 GHz.
Display: Both realme P3x 8GB RAM and vivo T4X 8GB RAM offer the same screen size of 6.72 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both realme P3x 8GB RAM and vivo T4X 8GB RAM feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both realme P3x 8GB RAM and vivo T4X 8GB RAM feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T4X 8GB RAM offers a higher battery capacity with 6500 mAh, while realme P3x 8GB RAM offers 6000 mAh, making vivo T4X 8GB RAM better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both realme P3x 8GB RAM and vivo T4X 8GB RAM offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: vivo T4X 8GB RAM receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while realme P3x 8GB RAM is rated 7.5.
User Rating: realme P3x 8GB RAM receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo T4X 8GB RAM has a rating of 4.4.
|
realme P3x 8GB RAM
₹18,499
@ Amazon
|
vivo T4X 8GB RAM
₹18,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
28 Feb, 2025
|
12 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
|
45W Super VOOC Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(1,470 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(128,062 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
414,477
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
13h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,499
|
₹18,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 28, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
414,477
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
42.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
382
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
27.2 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
950 nits
|
1050 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1050 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
392 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.33 %
|
86.24 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.4 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
76.22 mm
|
76.30 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.94 mm
|
8.09 mm
|
Weight
|
197 grams
|
204 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic Vegan Leather
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 2 meter)
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 75° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size OV50D 0.61µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8192 x 6144 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Cinema Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @60 fps
HD @120 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
AI Video Tracking |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 45W Super VOOC Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 56m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 14m 28s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.985 W/kg Body: 0.936 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.3
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,499
|
₹18,999
|