|
80%
realme P4x
₹17,949
|
77%
POCO C85 5G
₹14,440
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme P4x vs POCO C85 5G
Comparing the realme P4x vs POCO C85 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme P4x scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,994, while POCO C85 5G scores 1,947, making realme P4x the better performer.
Display: POCO C85 5G offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while realme P4x offers 6.72 inches, making POCO C85 5G the larger display of the two. POCO C85 5G features a IPS LCD display compared to realme P4x's LCD, making POCO C85 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both realme P4x and POCO C85 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both realme P4x and POCO C85 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: realme P4x delivers longer battery life with 17h 38m, while POCO C85 5G delivers 15h 19m, making realme P4x the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both realme P4x and POCO C85 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: realme P4x receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while POCO C85 5G is rated 7.8.
User Rating: realme P4x receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while POCO C85 5G has a rating of 3.8.
|
realme P4x
₹17,949
@ Amazon
|
POCO C85 5G
₹14,440
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
10 Dec, 2025
|
16 Dec, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
45W Super Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.8/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(11,454 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(1,239 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
974,831
AnTuTu Score
|
553,034
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 04, 2025
(Official)
|
Dec 09, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra MT6878T
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
974,831
|
553,034
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
1,017
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
21.1 %
|
13.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
950 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
810 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
391 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.42 %
|
81.85 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.4 %
|
81.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
166 mm
|
173.16 mm
|
Width
|
76 mm
|
81.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.39 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
208 grams
|
211 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Glass Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size OV50D 0.61µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera1/5.1" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3072 x 4096 Pixels
|
3072 x 4080 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps HD @30/60/120/240 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Slow Motion
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
7000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 49.9 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 45W Super Charging 100% in 90 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 38m
|
15h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 25m 0s
|
1h 7m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2048 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.180 W/kg Body: 0.720 W/kg
|
Head: 0.797 W/kg Body: 0.796 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
realme P4x
realme P4
realme P4x
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
realme P4x
vivo T4X
realme P4x
realme P3
realme P4x
vivo T5x
realme P4x
realme Narzo 90
realme P4x
Moto G67 Power
realme P4x
realme Narzo 90X
realme P4x
Moto G57 Power
realme P4x
realme P4 Lite 5G
realme P4x
Moto G86 Power
realme P4x
Xiaomi Redmi 15
realme P4x
realme P4 Power
realme P4x
OPPO K14x 5G
realme P4x
OPPO K13 5G
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Plus
POCO C85 5G
POCO C85x
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7
POCO C85 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
POCO C85 5G
POCO M7 Pro
POCO C85 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
POCO C85 5G
POCO C75
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
POCO C85 5G
OPPO K14x 5G
POCO C85 5G
iQOO Z10 Lite
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
POCO C85 5G
realme C83 5G
POCO C85 5G
Moto G35
POCO C85 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO C85 5G
realme P3 Lite