|
77%
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
OPPO F15
₹22,980
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo S1 Pro vs OPPO F15
Comparing the vivo S1 Pro vs OPPO F15 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F15 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,430, while vivo S1 Pro scores 1,369, making OPPO F15 the better performer.
Display: OPPO F15 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo S1 Pro offers 6.38 inches, making OPPO F15 the larger display of the two. vivo S1 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO F15's AMOLED, making vivo S1 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F15 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo S1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F15 offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo S1 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 23m, while OPPO F15 delivers 7h 24m, making vivo S1 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F15 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F15 equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo S1 Pro and OPPO F15 both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F15
₹22,980
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
04 Jan, 2020
|
16 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(38,771 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(28,485 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
172,519
AnTuTu Score
|
195,381
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
7h 24m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 04, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
172,519
|
195,381
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.7 %
|
46.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
430 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
404 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.39 %
|
84.21 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
90.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.2 mm
|
160.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
73.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
186.7 grams
|
172 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.794.71 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
5 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.54 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0 50% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 23m
|
7h 24m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 40m 3s
|
1h 1m 23s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.191 W/kg Body: 0.475 W/kg
|
Head: 1.20 W/kg Body: 0.55 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|