|
75%
vivo T4 Lite
₹18,499
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T4 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the vivo T4 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both vivo T4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G run at the same processing speed of 2.4 GHz.
Display: vivo T4 Lite offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 6.7 inches, making vivo T4 Lite the larger display of the two. Both vivo T4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo T4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while vivo T4 Lite offers 5 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both vivo T4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offer the same 6000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both vivo T4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: vivo T4 Lite receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
vivo T4 Lite
₹18,499
@ Amazon
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
02 Jul, 2025
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(39,142 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(4,871 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 02, 2025
(Official)
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
2 Year
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
3 Year
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
800 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.19 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with notch
|
Design
Height
|
167.30 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
76.95 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.19 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
202 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 14m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.91 W/kg Body: 0.88 W/kg
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
vivo T4 Lite
vivo T4X
vivo T4 Lite
iQOO Z10 Lite
vivo T4 Lite
OPPO K14x 5G
vivo T4 Lite
Xiaomi Redmi 15C
vivo T4 Lite
Moto G37 Power 5G
vivo T4 Lite
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
vivo T4 Lite
realme P3
vivo T4 Lite
vivo X300 FE
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
OPPO K14x 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
realme P4 Lite 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M36
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
POCO M7 Plus
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Ai+ Nova 2 5G