|
67%
vivo U10
₹10,990
(Out of Stock)
|
69%
Samsung Galaxy M10s
₹8,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo U10 vs Samsung Galaxy M10s
Comparing the vivo U10 vs Samsung Galaxy M10s across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo U10 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,401, while Samsung Galaxy M10s scores 923, making vivo U10 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M10s offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo U10 offers 6.35 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M10s the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M10s features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo U10's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M10s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo U10 and Samsung Galaxy M10s feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both vivo U10 and Samsung Galaxy M10s feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo U10 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy M10s offers 4000 mAh, making vivo U10 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both vivo U10 and Samsung Galaxy M10s offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo U10 and Samsung Galaxy M10s equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo U10 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M10s has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo U10
₹10,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M10s
₹8,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
29 Sep, 2019
|
29 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
720x1544 px (HD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(90,875 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(19,765 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
168,654
AnTuTu Score
|
109,860
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 25m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 29, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A73 1.35 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
14 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G71 MP2
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
168,654
|
109,860
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
31.3 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.1 %
|
38.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1544 px (HD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.3:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
268 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.91 %
|
84.79 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
159.4 mm
|
158.4 mm
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
74.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
7.8 mm
|
Weight
|
190.5 grams
|
169 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
13 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/1.927 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size S5K3L6 ISO-CELL 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/1.8 Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 26 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 25m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 54m 46s
|
1h 32m 54s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.047 W/kg Body: 0.445 W/kg
|
Head: 0.389 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|