|
93%
vivo X200T
₹59,999
|
80%
POCO X8 Pro
₹36,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo X200T vs POCO X8 Pro
Comparing the vivo X200T vs POCO X8 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X200T runs at a higher processing speed of 3.73 GHz, while POCO X8 Pro runs at 3.4 GHz, making vivo X200T the better performer.
Display: vivo X200T offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while POCO X8 Pro offers 6.59 inches, making vivo X200T the larger display of the two. vivo X200T features a AMOLED display compared to POCO X8 Pro's OLED, making vivo X200T the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo X200T and POCO X8 Pro feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo X200T offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while POCO X8 Pro offers 20 MP, making vivo X200T better for front camera photography.
Battery: POCO X8 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 6500 mAh, while vivo X200T offers 6200 mAh, making POCO X8 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both vivo X200T and POCO X8 Pro offer the same internal storage of 256 GB.
User Rating: vivo X200T receives a higher user rating of 4.6, while POCO X8 Pro has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo X200T
₹59,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
POCO X8 Pro
₹36,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
93%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
03 Feb, 2026
|
18 Mar, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
|
|
Octa Core (upto 3.73 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3.4 GHz)
|
|
12 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.59 inches (16.74 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
OLED
|
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1268x2756 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
50 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Lens
|
20 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6200 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
|
90W Flash Charging
|
100W Fast Charging
|
|
Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.4/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.6/5
(6,701 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(2,712 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
2,821,319
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹59,999
|
₹36,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 27, 2026
(Official)
|
Mar 17, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
5 Years
|
4 Year
|
Security Updates
|
7 Years
|
6 Year
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MT6691
|
MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
|
Processor
|
Octa core
3.73 GHz, Single core, Cortex X925 3.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 |
Octa core
3.4 GHz, Single core, Cortex A725 3.2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A725 2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A725 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
3 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
Mali-G720 MC8
|
RAM
|
12 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
LPDDR5X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
2,821,319
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
6,124
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
OLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.59 inches (16.74 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1268x2756 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
5000 nits
|
N/A
|
HBM Brightness
|
1600 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
460 ppi
|
460 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
90.35 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
94.30 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
160 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
74.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
7.99 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
203 grams
|
201.47 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Aluminium Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1 meter)
|
Yes IP68 IP69K (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57 Wide Angle23 mm focal length 1/1.57" sensor size LYT 702 1µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.5 Wide Angle26 mm focal length |
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Telephoto Camera70 mm focal length 1/1.95" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera15 mm focal length |
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera15 mm focal length 1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6144 x 8192 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
4k @60 fps
|
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
Video Pro Mode |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Primary Camera20 mm focal length 1/3.44" sensor size |
20 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
4k @60 fps
|
Full HD @60 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
6200 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Silicon Carbon
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 90W Flash Charging
|
Yes 100W Fast Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Yes 40W Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 14m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 44m 0s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB / 512 GB
|
256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n/ac/be/ax) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Ultrasonic
|
Optical
|
Compare Prices
|
₹59,999
|
₹36,999
|
Related Comparisons
vivo X200T
vivo V70 Elite
vivo X200T
vivo X300
vivo X200T
vivo X200
vivo X200T
vivo X300 FE
vivo X200T
Motorola Signature
vivo X200T
vivo X200 FE
vivo X200T
OnePlus 13
vivo X200T
Xiaomi 17T
vivo X200T
vivo V70
vivo X200T
OPPO Reno16 5G
vivo X200T
Samsung Galaxy S25
vivo X200T
OPPO Reno15 Pro Mini
vivo X200T
OnePlus 15R
vivo X200T
iQOO 15R
vivo X200T
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
POCO X8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5
POCO X8 Pro
POCO F7
POCO X8 Pro
POCO X7 Pro
POCO X8 Pro
POCO X8 Pro Max
POCO X8 Pro
OPPO K13 Turbo Pro
POCO X8 Pro
iQOO Neo 10
POCO X8 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
POCO X8 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
POCO X8 Pro
OnePlus Nord 6
POCO X8 Pro
Motorola Edge 70
POCO X8 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
POCO X8 Pro
realme GT 7
POCO X8 Pro
POCO X6 Pro
POCO X8 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
POCO X8 Pro
vivo T5 Pro