vivo X300 FE vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G

Comparing the vivo X300 FE vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: vivo X300 FE scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 9,051, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores 1,961, making vivo X300 FE the better performer.

Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while vivo X300 FE offers 6.31 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. vivo X300 FE features a AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making vivo X300 FE the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: vivo X300 FE offers a higher front camera resolution with 50 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 8 MP, making vivo X300 FE better for front camera photography.

Battery: vivo X300 FE delivers longer battery life with 16h 04m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making vivo X300 FE the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: vivo X300 FE offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making vivo X300 FE the better option for storage.

Expert Review: vivo X300 FE receives a higher expert rating of 8.4 from the editorial team, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G is rated 8.2.

User Rating: vivo X300 FE receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.2.

vivo X300 FE

₹79,999

@ Amazon

Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G

₹13,999

@ Samsung Shop

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

95%

76%

Release Date

06 May, 2026

17 Feb, 2026

Performance


Snapdragon 8 Gen 5	MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Octa Core (upto 3.8 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
12 GB RAM	4 GB RAM

Display


6.31 inches (16.03 cm)	6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
AMOLED	LCD
1216x2640 px (FHD+)	720x1600 px (HD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


50 MP Primary Camera	50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
50 MP Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)	2 MP Depth Camera
8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	N/A

Front Camera


50 MP	8 MP Wide Angle Lens

Battery


6500 mAh	6000 mAh
90W Flash Charging	25W Fast Charging
Wireless Charging	No Wireless Charging

Storage

256 GB	128 GB
UFS 4.1	eMMC 5.1

Expert Review

8.4/10

Read Expert Review

8.2/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Compact, premium design
Excellent battery life
Reliable performance
Strong portrait photography

Great camera performance across scenarios
Best-in-segment video playback
Capable front camera

Cons

Video recording inconsistencies
Colours can be slightly oversaturated

25W charging
LCD panel with HD+ resolution

User Ratings

4.5/5

(140 ratings)

4.2/5

(2,809 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

3,000,897 AnTuTu Score	532,024 AnTuTu Score
16h 04m Battery Life (PC Mark)	12h 51m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹79,999

@ Amazon

₹13,999

@ Samsung Shop

Compare in 360 View

Video

1 Video

There are no videos available for the device.

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

May 06, 2026

(Official)

Feb 09, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

5 Year

6 Years

Security Updates

7 Year

6 Years

Custom UI

Origin OS

Samsung One UI

Performance

Performance Rating

Excellent

Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 SM8845

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835

Processor

Octa core

3.8 GHz, Dual core, Oryon V3 Phoenix L 3.32 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon V3 Phoenix M

Octa core

2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

3 nm

6 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 829

Mali-G57 MC2

RAM

12 GB

4 GB / 6 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X Ultra

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

3,000,897

532,024

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

14.0 s

30.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

4,004

373

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

5.0 %

9.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

17.4 %

32.6 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Best In Class

Very Good

Display Type

AMOLED

LCD

Screen Size

6.31 inches (16.03 cm)

6.7 inches (17.02 cm)

Resolution

1216x2640 px (FHD+)

720x1600 px (HD+)

Peak Brightness

5000 nits

800 nits

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

19.5:9

20:9

Pixel Density

460 ppi

260 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

90.11 %

83.65 %

Screen Protection

Yes

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

Yes with notch

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes HDR 10+

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

94.38 %

N/A

Design

Height

150.83 mm

167.4 mm

Width

71.76 mm

77.4 mm

Thickness

7.99 mm

8.2 mm

Weight

191 grams

Build Material

Back: Glass

Back: Leather Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)

Yes Splash proof IP54

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Excellent

Good

Resolution

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57IMX921

50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size

50 MP
f/2.65 Telephoto Camera

2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

N/A

Autofocus

Yes

OIS

Yes

Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

N/A	8160 x 6120 Pixels

Camera Features

N/A	10 x Digital Zoom Auto Flash

Video Recording

8k @30 fps
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps

HD @120 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Best In Class

Very Good

Resolution

50 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera

8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

Autofocus

Yes

Flash

Yes Screen flash

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Excellent

Very Good

Capacity

6500 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Quick Charging

Yes 90W Flash Charging

Yes 25W Fast Charging

Wireless Charging

Yes 40W Wireless Charging

N/A

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

16h 04m

12h 51m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

0h 41m 0s

1h 14m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 GB / 512 GB

128 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.1

eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

No	Yes Up to 1.5 TB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N18 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N71 / N75
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1500(band 32) / 600(band 71) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26)

N/A

SIM 2

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N18 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N71 / N75
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 600(Band 71) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66)

N/A