Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo Y11 vs OPPO A15
Comparing the vivo Y11 vs OPPO A15 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO A15 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while vivo Y11 runs at 1.3 GHz, making OPPO A15 the better performer.
Display: OPPO A15 offers a screen size of 6.52 inches, while vivo Y11 offers 4 inches, making OPPO A15 the larger display of the two. Both vivo Y11 and OPPO A15 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: OPPO A15 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while vivo Y11 offers 5 MP, making OPPO A15 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO A15 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while vivo Y11 offers 2 MP, making OPPO A15 better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO A15 offers a higher battery capacity with 4230 mAh, while vivo Y11 offers 1700 mAh, making OPPO A15 better for longer battery life.
Storage: vivo Y11 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while OPPO A15 offers 32 GB, making vivo Y11 the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO A15 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while vivo Y11 has a rating of 3.6.
Summary
Spec Score
|
57%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
27 May, 2015
|
21 Oct, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
2 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
4230 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
6.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(92 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(9,221 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
109,267
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
15h 30m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Oct 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
109,267
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
59.24 %
|
83 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
88.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
123 mm
|
164 mm
|
Width
|
62.5 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
124 grams
|
175 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
4230 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
15h 30m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 23m 44s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|