Largest Gadget Discovery Site in India
Login/Signup
|
|
|
|
This limitation is very silly for a high power hardware like this, google play just doesn't install correctly on this tablet. But for this I would have given a 5 stars.nnOther than this the back panel is of poor build quality, could have been sturdy, sometimes the back panel heats up after a long usage. Wish HCL overcomes this problems in future tablets
I am one of the victim of HCL. Never buy any tablet of this company including this one. I trusted this company because my hcl computer gave a good service of 6 long years.nBut tablets of HCL are just crap. These none other than rebranded chinese cheap tablet brand. Most of them are refurbished high value chinese product. When I connect my HCL AM7-A1 tab(16000INR) with my computer it is shown as "dream" which meant the very first brand tablet which nothing but HTC dream chipset. This proves that this is nothing but a refurbished HTC dream phone sold as a new HCL tablet.nnTouch screen: Multi-touch Does not work, Whe I write message or anything it always mistype due to poor touch screen. nnBattery is too poor it never can be a 3500Amp battery. My tab barely operate upto 24 hours at idle state and if I watch youtube via wifi, it finished within 45 minute. So battery is horrible. nnGPS sometime works after 25 minute exposure in open sky, and that is also not accurate 500meters.nnPhone signal.: I never et signal when I am in train or bus.nnModem: WOrst. It only works if you are in stationary condition. If you move you will loose internet connectivity.nnHangs frequently.nnBecomes hot easily. Poor graviation sensor.nnnIn one word, This is just waste of money, nothing else. FLipkart should add a option to upload video review. It there was video review I could show you how bad this tab is.
| Brand | HCL |
| Model | ME Tablet G1 |
| Operating System | Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) |
| SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM |
| Network |
5G: Not Supported in India, 3G: Available |
| Height | 238 mm |
| Width | 186 mm |
| Thickness | 11.00 mm |
| Weight | 570 grams |
| Colours | Black |
| Screen Size | 9.7 inches (24.64 cm) |
| Screen Resolution | 1024 x 768 pixels |
| Pixel Density | 132 ppi |
| Display Type | IPS LCD |
| Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen |
| Screen to Body Ratio | 65.87 % |
| Processor | Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortext A9 |
| RAM | 1 GB |
| Internal Memory | 8 GB |
| Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
| Main Camera | ||
| Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
| Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
| Image Resolution | 1600 x 1200 Pixels | |
| Shooting Modes | Continuous Shooting | |
| Camera Features |
Digital Zoom Smile detection |
|
| Front Camera | ||
| Resolution |
0.3 MP, Primary Camera |
|
| Camera Features | Fixed Focus | |
| Capacity | 7000 mAh |
| Type | Li-Polymer |
| Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G |
| SIM 1 |
3G Speed: EV-DO category Rev.A
|
| Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v4 |
| HDMI | Yes |
Higher pixel density:
133 ppi vs 132 ppi
Lesser weight:
350 grams vs 570 grams
Smaller screen :
7.00 inches (17.78 cm) vs 9.70 inches (24.64 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher pixel density:
160 ppi vs 132 ppi
Larger screen:
10.00 inches (25.4 cm) vs 9.70 inches (24.64 cm)
Slower processor:
null 1.0 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Lower primary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Higher battery capacity:
7500 mAH vs 7000 mAH
More internal memory:
16 GB vs 8 GB
Lesser thickness:
8.5 mm vs 11 mm
Faster processor:
Dual core 2.0 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
More RAM:
2 GB vs 1 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Rs 23,999
Rs 32,250
Rs 31,999
Rs 22,870
Rs 19,999
Rs 69,999
Rs 39,990
Rs 36,999
Rs 16,500
Rs 64,999
Rs 19,999
Rs 23,599
Rs 25,499
Rs 112,300
Rs 24,999
Rs 23,999
Rs 39,999
Rs 17,999
Rs 19,999
Rs 26,999
Rs 19,999
Rs 12,999
Rs 26,899
Rs 22,451
Rs 13,999
Rs 23,900
Rs 14,999
Rs 11,999
Rs 12,299
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
Rs 31,900
