1. Trusted Brand
2. HTC has over 200 service locations spread over India covering most major cities. Toll Free Number: 18002663566
Official Website
|
|
|
|
While we applaud the Taiwanese brand s effort to cater to the budget segment, the device doesn t have enough to take on the recently-launched giants in its price band
Aug 01 2014 By Nitansh RastogiAs a device, the HTC Desire 516 fails to arouse any interest apart from the fact that it features a large 5-inch display. The specs are average at best, and poor storage and battery life sour the deal further. What works against the smartphone, though, is that it fails to get a grip of the rapidly-evolving competitive landscape. It can’t match rival offerings such as the Micromax Canvas Turbo A250, Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus (first impressions), etcetera from Indian handset makers boasti
Read Full Review1) fixed focus.....this is shit for the phone of 15000 inrn2)it is not full hd or hd....it is just (qhd)n3) snapdragon 200 is not a powerfull processer..n4) 4 gb internal...this is not enough.nnIt is far behind from asus zenphone 5..... nnSuggest not to buy... This..
I HUMBLY REQUEST YOU ALL. DONT BUY THIS PHONE IM TRAPPED. THE WORST 5MP CAMERA IVE EVER SEEN.... IM TOTALY DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS CAMERA PRIMARY CAMERA HAVE LESS POWER THAN SECONDARY
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Front Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 1950 mAh |
Display | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Launch Date | June 25, 2014 (Official) |
Operating System | Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 |
CPU | Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Adreno 302 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LED |
Screen Size | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Resolution | 540x960 px |
Pixel Density |
220 ppi
Below Average
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 68.21 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 140 mm Compare Size |
Width | 72 mm |
Thickness |
9.7 mm
Average
|
Weight |
173 grams
Good
|
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP f/2.8, Primary Camera |
|
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Video Recording | 1280x720 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Video Recording |
Other 854x480 fps |
Capacity | 1950 mAh |
Type | Li-Polymer |
Removable | Yes |
TalkTime | Up to 9 Hours(3G) |
Standby time | Up to 220 Hours(3G) |
USB Type-C | No |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Mini |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 21.1 Mbit/s ↓, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s ↑ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Fingerprint Sensor | No |
Other Sensors | Accelerometer |
Faster processor:
Octa core 1.4 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Higher battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 1950 mAH
More RAM:
512 MB vs 1 GB
Lesser SIM card slots:
1 vs 2
Lower secondary camera resolution:
0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Common Features
Higher battery capacity:
2070 mAH vs 1950 mAH
Higher pixel density:
326 ppi vs 220 ppi
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
Larger screen:
5.50 inches (13.97 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Quad core 1.2 GHz
More RAM:
1.5 GB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2100 mAH vs 1950 mAH
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
More expandable memory:
64 GB vs 32 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Higher battery capacity:
2070 mAH vs 1950 mAH
Higher pixel density:
294 ppi vs 220 ppi
Rs 25,990