1. Trusted Brand
2. An established brand in computer peripherals, iBall has now been making phones for more than 5 years as well. It is popular for its Andi series and in the first quater of 2015, it claimed to be the largest tablet manufacturer in India.
3. iBall has over 750 service locations spread over India covering major cities like Delhi, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, and Bangalore. Toll Free Number: 180030042255
|
|
|
|
I really liked the tablet. Affordable product. Nice features.
Its not a performance tablet, just to show peoples that we have Lenovo tab. Huh! The RAM should be 1GB for some good performance. 3G not available, even 3G dongle support not specified.
Brand | iBall |
Model | Slide 2G 7227 |
Operating System | Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean) |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network |
5G: Not Supported in India, 2G: Available |
Colours | Black |
Screen Size | 7.0 inches (17.78 cm) |
Screen Resolution | 600 x 1024 pixels |
Pixel Density | 170 ppi |
Display Type | TFT |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Processor | Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A9 |
RAM | 512 MB |
Internal Memory | 4 GB |
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
Main Camera | ||
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Image Resolution | 1600 x 1200 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Resolution |
0.3 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 3500 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 2G |
SIM 1 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
|
Voice Calling | Yes |
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi |
Bluetooth | Yes |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Larger screen:
10.10 inches (25.65 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.83 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
5 MP vs 2 MP
Higher battery capacity:
4000 mAH vs 3500 mAH
Slower processor:
null 800 MHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Lesser RAM:
256 MB vs 512 MB
Larger screen:
8.00 inches (20.32 cm) vs 7.00 inches (17.78 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.83 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
4600 mAH vs 3500 mAH
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
Lesser RAM:
1 GB vs 512 MB
Faster processor:
Dual core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
Lower battery capacity:
2500 mAH vs 3500 mAH
Lower pixel density:
133 ppi vs 170 ppi
Common Features
Faster processor:
Dual core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.0 GHz
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
Lesser RAM:
1 GB vs 512 MB
Rs 23,999