Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Google Tensor G4's 1,400,792 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.

Google Tensor G4

Samsung Exynos 2500

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

Aug, 2024

Jun, 2025

CPU

Octa core

(3.1 GHz, Single Core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.92 GHz, Quad core)

Deca Core

(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)

Process Node

4 nm

3 nm

GPU

Mali-G715 MP7

Xclipse 950

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

AnTuTu Score

1,400,792

View Benchmark Details

1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Score

1,980/4,757

View Benchmark Details

2,064/7,609

View Benchmark Details

Phones Powered by These SoCs

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Score: N/A

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Score: 1,515,751

₹109,999

Benchmark

AnTuTu (The higher, the better)

AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios

Google Tensor G4 1,400,792

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 1,515,751

View Benchmark Details

CPU

468,536

379,701

GPU

407,988

529,745

Memory

232,299

360,939

291,969

245,366

Geekbench (The higher, the better)

The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Geekbench Single Core

Google Tensor G4 1,980

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 2,064

View Benchmark Details

Geekbench Multi Core

Google Tensor G4 4,757

View Benchmark Details

Samsung Exynos 2500 7,609

View Benchmark Details

Benchmark Screenshots

AnTuTu Score:

General

SoC Brand

Google

Samsung

Title

Google Tensor G4

Samsung Exynos 2500

Model No

GS401

S5E9955

Manufacturing

Samsung

CPU

Total Cores

Octa core

Deca Core

CPU

Octa core (3.1 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)

Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Process Node

4 nm

3 nm

Instruction Set

ARMv9.2-A

L1 Cache

N/A

128 KB

L2 Cache

N/A

3 MB

L3 Cache

N/A

16 MB

GPU

Mali-G715 MP7

Xclipse 950

GPU Clock speed

940 MHz

999 MHz

Pipelines

Shading Units

128

Total Shaders

896

1024

FLOPS

1684.4 Gigaflops

4091.9 Gigaflops

Vulkan Version

1.3

1.4

OpenCL Version

2.0 FP

3.0 FP

DirectX Version

N/A

12.1

Memory

Memory Type

LPDDR5X

Memory Speed

4.266 GHz

4.8 GHz

Bus

4x16 Bit

Memory Max bandwidth

68.2 Gb/s

76.8 Gb/s

Memory Max size

16 GB

24 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.0

Camera

Max Camera Sensor Supported

N/A

320 MP

Max Video Capture Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

Display

Max On-Device Display Resolution

3840x2400

UHD

Max Refresh Rate

N/A

120 Hz

Multimedia

Video Playback Resolution

8K @ 30 FPS

8K @ 60 FPS

Video Codecs

H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9

H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9

Audio Codecs

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Name

Exynos 5400c

Exynos 5400

5G Support

Yes

Peak Download Speed

N/A	Up to 12100 Mbps

Peak Upload Speed

N/A	Up to 3670 Mbps

Wi-Fi Version

Wi-Fi Standard

a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz

Bluetooth Version

6.0

5.4

Navigation

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS

BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS

User Feedback

Related Comparisons

Google Tensor G4

Samsung Exynos 2400

Google Tensor G4

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Google Tensor G4

Google Tensor G5

Google Tensor G4

Apple A17 Pro

Google Tensor G4

Apple A16 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A18 Pro

Samsung Exynos 2500

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2500

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

Samsung Exynos 2500

Google Tensor G5

Samsung Exynos 2500

Apple A17 Pro