|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
Share
Based on benchmark performance, MediaTek Dimensity 9400 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 2,537,181 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Samsung Exynos 2500's 2,471,984 (tested by 91Mobiles), making MediaTek Dimensity 9400 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Oct, 2024
|
Jun, 2025
|
CPU
|
Octa core
(3.62 GHz, Single Core + 3.3 GHz, Tri core + 2.4 GHz, Quad core)
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
Xclipse 950
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
2,537,181
|
2,471,984
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,819/8,515
|
2,346/7,911
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2,537,181
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,471,984
CPU
588,394
779,211
GPU
1,134,289
975,814
Memory
409,244
269,705
UX
405,254
447,254
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2,819
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,346
Geekbench Multi Core
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
8,515
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,911
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
MediaTek
|
Samsung
|
Title
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
Model No
|
MT6991
|
S5E9955
|
Manufacturing
|
TSMC
|
Samsung
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Octa core
|
Deca Core
|
CPU
|
Octa core (3.62 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 3.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex X4 + 2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720)
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
128 KB
|
L2 Cache
|
2 MB
|
3 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
12 MB
|
16 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Immortalis-G925 MC12
|
Xclipse 950
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.612 GHz
|
999 MHz
|
Pipelines
|
12
|
8
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1536
|
1024
|
FLOPS
|
4952.1 Gigaflops
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
1.4
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
3.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
12.1
|
AI
NPU
|
NPU 890
|
N/A
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
5.333 GHz
|
4.8 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
85.3 Gb/s
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
320 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
UHD
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
180 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Color Depth
|
10 bit
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
N/A
|
Exynos 5400
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 7300 Mbps
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
N/A
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
6.0
|
5.4
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Samsung Exynos 2600
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Apple A19 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Samsung Exynos 2400
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2600
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A19 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2400