|
|
|
|
The Verico Shape 5 V3 has potential, but the dated Android version makes it tough to recommend
Mar 17 2015 By Nitansh RastogiGiven the price at which the Shape 5 V3 comes at, there are better options available in the market. The Verico Shape 5 V3 stands nowhere in front of rivals like the Xiaomi Redmi 2 (review) and the Lenovo A6000 (review) which give us better screens, processors and batteries - all at a lower price. The YU Yureka (review) is another good option if shelling out a little extra doesn`t hurt you and you are  okay with the larger screen size. The YU Yureka, which is priced at Rs 8,999, features a 5.5-inch, 720 x 1,280 display, powered by 1.5GHz processor alongside 2GB RAM, 13-megapixel rear camera and a planned upgrade to Android Lollipop. While all these three devices are 4G enabled, the Verico Shape 5 V3 sticks with 3G. The inclusion of a rear touch panel may be something new in the Indian market (at least at this budget) but in terms of ease of use, it is far behind what the company claims. Verico will need to work on equipping its future devices with better specifications and pricing if it wants to make a stand in India`s fiercely competitive budget smartphone category.
Read Full Reviewused this phone..touch screen response is gr8,really gud camera and back touch feature makes lot easier to use with single hand selfies, coming from taiwanese manufacturer luks more robust n reliable in hardware overall a total value for money phone..
The product and feature looks good. How about after sales support? Please provide list of service centers. I want to buy but same time wants to ensure myself not wasting my money because I know the importance of service support since it is a new company
RAM | 1 GB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6582 |
Rear Camera | 13 MP |
Front Camera | 5 MP |
Battery | 2100 mAh |
Display | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6582 |
CPU | Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7 |
RAM |
1 GB
Good
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 5.0 inches (12.7 cm) |
Resolution | 540x960 px |
Pixel Density |
220 ppi
Below Average
|
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Thickness |
8.5 mm
Good
|
Colours | Black |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
13 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 2100 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 850 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes |
GPS | Yes |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
Higher pixel density:
312 ppi vs 220 ppi
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
More expandable memory:
128 GB vs 32 GB
Larger screen:
5.50 inches (13.97 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.6 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
More RAM:
2 GB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2200 mAH vs 2100 mAH
Higher pixel density:
312 ppi vs 220 ppi
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
More internal memory:
8 GB vs 4 GB
More expandable memory:
64 GB vs 32 GB
Slower processor:
Dual core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
Larger screen:
5.50 inches (13.97 cm) vs 5.00 inches (12.7 cm)
Higher battery capacity:
2500 mAH vs 2100 mAH
Higher pixel density:
267 ppi vs 220 ppi
Faster processor:
Octa core 1.7 GHz vs Quad core 1.3 GHz
More RAM:
2 GB vs 1 GB
Higher battery capacity:
2500 mAH vs 2100 mAH
Rs 23,999