1. Trusted Brand
2. Popularly known as the "Apple of China" for both its insipration and innovation. Xiaomi enjoys a massive following around the globe. Making its appearence in India in 2014, it soon topped the popularity charts by offering high-end specs at low price tags.
3. Xiaomi has service centers in most major cities in the country
Official WebsiteThe Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a nicely built tablet loaded with great features. The device provides an outstanding battery backup which is good enough to back heavy usage. You can save a lot of songs, videos, etc. due to the presence of a massive inbuilt storage. The device can efficiently perform multitasking jobs and also is a treat for gaming-freaks. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 does not support voice calling, which is a major drawback point around this price tag. Overall, it is a great package to own at such an inexpensive price range.
|
|
|
|
The Mi Pad 4 brings substantial changes over its predecessor, including AI-enabled face unlock capabilities
Jun 27 2018 By Geetika SachdevXiaomi has revealed that The Mi Pad 4 will skip a fingerprint scanner in favour of AI-driven face unlock technology
Jun 22 2018 By Akshay KumarThe Mi Pad 4 is set to unveil next week in China
Jun 21 2018 By Akshay KumarThe Mi Pad 4 tablet is expected to sport an 18:9 display, while the Redmi 6 Pro is said to feature a display notch
Jun 20 2018 By Akshay KumarLaunch Date | December 13, 2018 (Official) | |
Brand | Xiaomi | |
Model | Mi Pad 4 | |
Operating System | Android v8.1 (Oreo) | |
Custom UI | MIUI | |
Network | 4G: Not Available, 3G: Not Available |
Height | 200.2 mm | |
Width | 120.3 mm | |
Thickness | 7.9 mm | |
Weight | 342.5 grams | |
Colours | Black, Gold |
Screen Size | 8.0 inches (20.32 cm) | |
Screen Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | |
Pixel Density | 283 ppi | |
Display Type | IPS LCD | |
Touch Screen |
![]() |
|
Screen to Body Ratio | 77.32 % |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | |
Processor | Octa core (2.2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260) | |
Architecture | 64 bit | |
Graphics | Adreno 512 | |
RAM | 3 GB |
Internal Memory | 32 GB | |
Expandable Memory |
![]() |
Main Camera | ||
Resolution |
13 MP f/2.0 Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus |
![]() |
|
Aperture | F2.0 | |
Flash |
![]() |
|
Image Resolution | 4128 x 3096 Pixels | |
Settings | Exposure compensation, ISO control | |
Shooting Modes | Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face detection, Touch to focus | |
Video Recording | 1920x1080 @ 30 fps | |
Front Camera | ||
Resolution |
5 MP f/2.0 Primary Camera |
|
Sensor | CMOS | |
Aperture | F2.0 | |
Flash |
![]() |
Capacity | 6000 mAh | |
Type | Li-Polymer | |
User Replaceable |
![]() |
Voice Calling |
![]() |
|
Wi-Fi |
![]() |
|
Wi-Fi Features | Wi-Fi Direct | |
Bluetooth |
![]() |
|
NFC |
![]() |
|
USB Connectivity | Mass storage device, USB charging |
FM Radio |
![]() |
|
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Accelerometer |
Larger screen:
10.1 inches vs 8 inches
More RAM:
4 GB vs 3 GB
Higher battery capacity:
8620 mAH vs 6000 mAH
More RAM:
4 GB vs 3 GB
More internal memory:
64 GB vs 32 GB
Common Features
More RAM:
4 GB vs 3 GB
Higher battery capacity:
6600 mAH vs 6000 mAH
Higher pixel density:
324 ppi vs 283 ppi
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.4 GHz vs Quad core 2.2 GHz
Lesser RAM:
2 GB vs 3 GB
Lower primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 13 MP
Faster processor:
Octa core 2.0 GHz vs Quad core 2.2 GHz
Lesser thickness:
7 mm vs 7.9 mm
Lesser weight:
300 grams vs 342.5 grams
Lesser thickness:
7.5 mm vs 7.9 mm
Lesser weight:
320 grams vs 342.5 grams
Slower processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Quad core 2.2 GHz
A
A
Abdul Patel
2000deepaktendulkar
03d497c16a057039
M
M
Manish Kumar
S
S
Shivangi Mukopadhyay
Rs 49,990