|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2500 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,515,751 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to MediaTek Dimensity 9200's 1,203,466 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2500 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jun, 2025
|
Nov, 2022
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.3 GHz, Single Core + 2.74 GHz, Dual core + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core + 1.8 GHz, Dual core)
|
Octa core
(3.05 GHz, Single Core + 2.85 GHz, Tri core + 1.8 GHz, Quad core)
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
4 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Immortalis-G715 MC11
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,515,751
|
1,203,466
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,064/7,609
|
1,256/3,451
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2500
1,515,751
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1,203,466
CPU
379,701
262,249
GPU
529,745
517,920
Memory
360,939
229,403
UX
245,366
193,894
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
2,064
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1,256
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2500
7,609
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3,451
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
MediaTek
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2500
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
|
Model No
|
S5E9955
|
MT6985
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.3 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X925 + 2.74 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A725 + 2.36 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Octa core (3.05 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X3 + 2.85 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A715 + 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
3 nm
|
4 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9-A
|
L1 Cache
|
128 KB
|
N/A
|
L2 Cache
|
3 MB
|
1 MB
|
L3 Cache
|
16 MB
|
8 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 950
|
Immortalis-G715 MC11
|
GPU Clock speed
|
999 MHz
|
981 MHz
|
Pipelines
|
8
|
11
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
1024
|
1408
|
FLOPS
|
4091.9 Gigaflops
|
2762.5 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.4
|
1.3
|
OpenCL Version
|
3.0 FP
|
3.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
N/A
|
AI
NPU
|
N/A
|
APU 690
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.8 GHz
|
4.266 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
76.8 Gb/s
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
24 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
320 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
UHD
|
QHD+
|
Max Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
240 Hz
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC-LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
MediaTek T800
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
Up to 7900 Mbps
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
Up to 4200 Mbps
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
7
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
a, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.4
|
5.3
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2500
Samsung Exynos 2400
Samsung Exynos 2500
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2500
Google Tensor G5
Samsung Exynos 2500
Apple A17 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Apple A17 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Google Tensor G4
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Apple A16 Bionic
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Apple A15 Bionic
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1