|
72%
Honor 9N 64GB
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Honor 9N 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the Honor 9N 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Honor 9N 64GB runs at 2.36 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Honor 9N 64GB offers 5.84 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. Honor 9N 64GB features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making Honor 9N 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Honor 9N 64GB offers 13 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Honor 9N 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 8 MP, making Honor 9N 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Honor 9N 64GB offers 3000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Honor 9N 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Honor 9N 64GB the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Honor 9N 64GB is rated 6.
User Rating: Honor 9N 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Honor 9N 64GB
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
31 Jul, 2018
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.36 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.84 inches (14.83 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
6.0/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(234,150 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(10,451 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,780
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 31, 2018
(Official)
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.0 (Oreo)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
EMUI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin 659
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.36 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
16 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T830 MP2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.84 inches (14.83 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2280 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
432 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
79.07 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
79 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
149.2 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
71.8 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
152 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2CMOS image sensor |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraCMOS |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
|
4G Speed: 50 Mbit/s ↑ 150 Mbit/s ↓ (LTE category 4)
|
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
|
4G Speed: 50 Mbit/s ↑ 150 Mbit/s ↓ (LTE category 4)
|
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,780
@ Amazon
|