|
77%
Infinix Zero 8i
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Infinix Zero 8i vs realme Narzo 20 Pro
Comparing the Infinix Zero 8i vs realme Narzo 20 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Infinix Zero 8i scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,680, while realme Narzo 20 Pro scores 1,633, making Infinix Zero 8i the better performer.
Display: Infinix Zero 8i offers a screen size of 6.85 inches, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 6.5 inches, making Infinix Zero 8i the larger display of the two. Both Infinix Zero 8i and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Infinix Zero 8i and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Infinix Zero 8i and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Infinix Zero 8i and realme Narzo 20 Pro offer the same 4500 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: realme Narzo 20 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Zero 8i offers 128 GB, making realme Narzo 20 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Infinix Zero 8i and realme Narzo 20 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 20 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Infinix Zero 8i has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Infinix Zero 8i
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
03 Dec, 2020
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G90T
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.85 inches (17.4 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP + 8 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
65W Super Dart Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(7,159 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(112,162 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
291,302
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
13h 15m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 03, 2020
(Official)
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
XOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G90T
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
291,302
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
57.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.85 inches (17.4 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
392 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
87.04 %
|
83.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.1 %
|
90.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
168.7 mm
|
162.3 mm
|
Width
|
76 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
210.5 grams
|
191 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.79 |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle 105° field-of-view Camera |
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging
|
Yes 65W Super Dart Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 15m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 33m 32s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.399 W/kg Body: 0.954 W/kg
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.934 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|