|
52%
Karbonn A21
₹9,899
(Out of Stock)
|
54%
XOLO A700
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A21 vs XOLO A700
Comparing the Karbonn A21 vs XOLO A700 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A21 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while XOLO A700 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn A21 the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn A21 and XOLO A700 offer the same screen size of 4.5 inches, but XOLO A700 features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn A21's TFT, making XOLO A700 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn A21 and XOLO A700 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Karbonn A21 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while XOLO A700 offers 0.3 MP, making Karbonn A21 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Karbonn A21 offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while XOLO A700 offers 1700 mAh, making Karbonn A21 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn A21 and XOLO A700 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: XOLO A700 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Karbonn A21 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Karbonn A21
₹9,899
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
XOLO A700
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
11 Oct, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon S4 Play
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1800 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(316 ratings)
|
4/5
(263 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 11, 2012
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A5
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A9
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 203
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
207 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.98 %
|
59.88 %
|
Design
Height
|
112 mm
|
136 mm
|
Width
|
60.5 mm
|
68.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
9.10 mm
|
Weight
|
104 grams
|
115 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 25 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 3.9(3G) / Up to 6.9(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|