1. Trusted Brand
2. Founded in 2009, Karbonn mobiles is a well-known Indian brand. It primarily deals in affordable and value-for-money mobiles and tablets.
3. Toll-free No. 1800 116 2666
Official Website
|
|
|
|
I am using this phone for 10 days now. There are many good things which people have mentioned so time for some real things.nn1. The processor although "dual-core" is very sluggish. You install a live wallpaper and the phone starts to lag.nn2. Cellular signals are not very strong and they keep coming and going.nn3. Phone charging is fast but discharge even faster. Currently I need to charge the phone twice a day if I am using data connection/wi-fi for around an hour.nn4. The charger pin is hard to remove and if you try to force it out, the plastic back also comes out along with it. The back does not fits completely and there is considerable gap in the sides.nn5. If you are using your apps in USB mode the touch starts to act funny(maybe only in my case). You touch somewhere and the response comes somewhere else. You try to open one app but another one opens up.nn6. The front camera although is 1.3 MP but the output is very sluggish. nn7. The rear camera is good but if you try to take a panorama shot, the image is blur and jumbled.nn8. The phone is not playing any video which is above 20 mb in size. I tried playing the videos through MX player but they just do not run.nn9. RAM is 512 mb however the phone is not running any HD game.nnSo, make a informed decision.nnThanks.
I have gone for this phone because of its features and its price advantage. One month back I bought Sony Xperia P for one of my family members. After spending Rs.23,000, it still gets stuck while opening the Gallery and the Maps. Every time I need to restart the phone to get the Gallery open. If the performance of a phone of Rs.23000 itself is like this, then I thought that, nothing is wrong in buying a phone with better features at lowest price. So I decided to buy Karbonn A21 for myself.nI got my Karbonn A21 through Flipkart yesterday. Let me review about the Pros and Cons of this phone by comparing with our Sony Xperia P.nPros: n• Wide Screen display of 4.5” against 4” in Xperia Pn• Slimmer than Xperia Pn• 1.2 GHz Dual core processor against 1 GHz Dual coren• Internet connection through Wifi Direct is faster than Xperia Pn• 12 Hrs continuous battery life while browsing against 5 Hrs in Xperian• Phone comes with scratch guard film fixed and one additional film in the boxn• Dual GSM sim card facility against single GSM simn• Equally good touch screen display and graphicsn• Camera quality is equally good although it is 5 MPixn• Lesser SAR value than Xperia Pn• 1.3 MP Secondary camera against 0.3 MP in Xperia Pn• Normal Sims against Micro Sim in Xperia.n• Battery can be removed, against inbuilt in Xperia PnCons:n• Weight of 130 Gms against 120 Gmsn• Back Cover looks flimsyn• Even though screen display can be compared with xperia P, touch response of A21 has a lag of fraction of seconds.n• Charger adopter slot in the phone is very tightn• No HD video callingn• 3D sweep panorama in camera not availablen• Although face detection is available, smile detection is not availablenGeneral Satisfaction level:n “ All is Well” in both these phones, Except “Price and Fame!”
RAM | 512 MB |
Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Front Camera | 1.3 MP |
Battery | 1800 mAh |
Display | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Launch Date | October 11, 2012 (Official) |
Operating System | Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 |
CPU | Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A5 |
Graphics | Adreno 203 |
RAM |
512 MB
Below Average
|
Display Type | TFT |
Screen Size | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Resolution | 480x800 px |
Pixel Density |
207 ppi
Poor
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 84.98 % |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 112 mm Compare Size |
Width | 60.5 mm |
Thickness |
11.5 mm
Below Average
|
Weight |
104 grams
Excellent
|
Colours | Black |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
Flash | Yes, LED Flash | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
1.3 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 1800 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
TalkTime | Up to 5 Hours(2G) |
Standby time | Up to 200 Hours(2G) |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Dual SIM, GSM+GSM |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz 3G Speed: HSDPA 7.2 Mbit/s ↓ GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
SIM 2 |
2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes |
USB Connectivity | USB 2.0, microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Other Sensors | Accelerometer |
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Higher pixel density:
233 ppi vs 207 ppi
Lesser thickness:
10.3 mm vs 11.5 mm
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Higher battery capacity:
2000 mAH vs 1800 mAH
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Higher pixel density:
217 ppi vs 207 ppi
Lesser thickness:
9.8 mm vs 11.5 mm
Higher pixel density:
245 ppi vs 207 ppi
Lesser thickness:
9.1 mm vs 11.5 mm
Slower processor:
Dual core 1.0 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Smaller screen :
3.50 inches (8.89 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Slower processor:
null 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.2 GHz
Lesser RAM:
2 GB vs 512 MB
Higher pixel density:
233 ppi vs 207 ppi
Lesser thickness:
11.3 mm vs 11.5 mm
Smaller screen :
4.00 inches (10.16 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Rs 25,990