|
52%
Karbonn A21
₹9,899
(Out of Stock)
|
iBall Andi 4.5h
₹9,250
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A21 vs iBall Andi 4.5h
Comparing the Karbonn A21 vs iBall Andi 4.5h across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A21 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while iBall Andi 4.5h runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn A21 the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn A21 and iBall Andi 4.5h offer the same screen size of 4.5 inches, but iBall Andi 4.5h features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn A21's TFT, making iBall Andi 4.5h the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi 4.5h offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn A21 offers 5 MP, making iBall Andi 4.5h better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Karbonn A21 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while iBall Andi 4.5h offers 0.3 MP, making Karbonn A21 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Karbonn A21 offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while iBall Andi 4.5h offers 1600 mAh, making Karbonn A21 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn A21 and iBall Andi 4.5h offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn A21 and iBall Andi 4.5h both receive the same user rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Karbonn A21
₹9,899
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
iBall Andi 4.5h
₹9,250
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
11 Oct, 2012
|
17 Dec, 2012
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon S4 Play
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1800 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(316 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(150 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 11, 2012
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A5
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A9
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 203
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
DDR3
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
207 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.98 %
|
68.55 %
|
Design
Height
|
112 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
60.5 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
10.6 mm
|
Weight
|
104 grams
|
126 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Frame: Plastic
Back: Plastic |
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.43 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|