Karbonn Sparkle V
₹6,590
(Out of Stock)
|
71%
Itel City 100
₹7,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Sparkle V vs Itel City 100
Comparing the Karbonn Sparkle V vs Itel City 100 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel City 100 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.8 GHz, while Karbonn Sparkle V runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel City 100 the better performer.
Display: Itel City 100 offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Karbonn Sparkle V offers 4.5 inches, making Itel City 100 the larger display of the two. Both Karbonn Sparkle V and Itel City 100 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Itel City 100 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Karbonn Sparkle V offers 5 MP, making Itel City 100 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Itel City 100 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn Sparkle V offers 2 MP, making Itel City 100 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Itel City 100 offers a higher battery capacity with 5200 mAh, while Karbonn Sparkle V offers 1700 mAh, making Itel City 100 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Karbonn Sparkle V offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Itel City 100 offers 128 GB, making Karbonn Sparkle V the better option for storage.
|
✕
Karbonn Sparkle V
₹6,590
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel City 100
₹7,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
15 Sep, 2014
|
07 Jul, 2025
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(1,425 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
294,005
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 15, 2014
(Official)
|
Jul 07, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v14
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
Mali-G57 MP1
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
294,005
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
38.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
700 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
700 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
74.8 %
|
84.64 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
113 mm
|
167.7 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.4 mm
|
7.65 mm
|
Weight
|
107 grams
|
185 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 40m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Accelerometer
|