Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
71%
Itel City 100
₹7,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 vs Itel City 100
Comparing the Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 vs Itel City 100 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel City 100 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.8 GHz, while Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel City 100 the better performer.
Display: Itel City 100 offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 offers 4.5 inches, making Itel City 100 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 and Itel City 100 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Itel City 100 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 offers 5 MP, making Itel City 100 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Itel City 100 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 offers 2 MP, making Itel City 100 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Itel City 100 offers a higher battery capacity with 5200 mAh, while Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 offers 1700 mAh, making Itel City 100 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Itel City 100 offers 128 GB, making Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502 the better option for storage.
|
Micromax Canvas A1 AQ4502
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Itel City 100
₹7,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
01 Jun, 2015
|
07 Jul, 2025
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(243 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
294,005
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jul 07, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v14
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
Mali-G57 MP1
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
294,005
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
38.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
700 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
700 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
84.64 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
167.7 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
7.65 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
185 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
5200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 40m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|