Microsoft Lumia 638
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Microsoft Lumia 638 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Microsoft Lumia 638 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Microsoft Lumia 638 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Microsoft Lumia 638 offers 4.5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Microsoft Lumia 638 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Microsoft Lumia 638 offers 5 MP, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Microsoft Lumia 638 offers 1830 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Microsoft Lumia 638 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 64 GB, making Microsoft Lumia 638 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Microsoft Lumia 638
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
18 Dec, 2014
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 400
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1830 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(603 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
64.59 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
129.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
66.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.2 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Weight
|
134 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.428 mm focal length |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Macro Mode
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1830 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) |
N/A
|
|
4G Speed: 50 Mbit/s ↑ 150 Mbit/s ↓ (LTE category 4)
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
N/A
|