|
74%
Moto G10 Power
₹12,999
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy F22
₹9,149
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G10 Power vs Samsung Galaxy F22
Comparing the Moto G10 Power vs Samsung Galaxy F22 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F22 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,344, while Moto G10 Power scores 1,126, making Samsung Galaxy F22 the better performer.
Display: Moto G10 Power offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Samsung Galaxy F22 offers 6.4 inches, making Moto G10 Power the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy F22 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Moto G10 Power's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy F22 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Moto G10 Power and Samsung Galaxy F22 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F22 offers a higher front camera resolution with 13 MP, while Moto G10 Power offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F22 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G10 Power delivers longer battery life with 25h 23m, while Samsung Galaxy F22 delivers 17h 37m, making Moto G10 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G10 Power and Samsung Galaxy F22 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Moto G10 Power and Samsung Galaxy F22 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F22 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G10 Power has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Moto G10 Power
₹12,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F22
₹9,149
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
16 Mar, 2021
|
13 Jul, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(62,517 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(106,450 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
144,364
AnTuTu Score
|
183,262
AnTuTu Score
|
|
25h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
₹9,149
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 16, 2021
(Official)
|
Jul 13, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
144,364
|
183,262
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
45.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.5 %
|
3.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
274 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.57 %
|
83.52 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
85 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
165.2 mm
|
160 mm
|
Width
|
75.7 mm
|
74 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
203 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 45 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
25h 23m
|
17h 37m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 30m 9s
|
2h 12m 15s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.01 W/kg Body: 1.43 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
₹9,149
|