|
73%
Moto G10 Power
₹12,999
@Flipkart
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,745
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G10 Power vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the Moto G10 Power vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,961, while Moto G10 Power scores 1,126, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Moto G10 Power offers 6.5 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. Moto G10 Power features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making Moto G10 Power the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Moto G10 Power offers 48 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Moto G10 Power and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G10 Power delivers longer battery life with 25h 23m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making Moto G10 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Moto G10 Power offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Moto G10 Power the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Moto G10 Power is rated 7.
User Rating: Moto G10 Power receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Moto G10 Power
₹12,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,745
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
16 Mar, 2021
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(62,517 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(10,060 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
144,364
AnTuTu Score
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
25h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹15,745
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 16, 2021
(Official)
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
144,364
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.5 %
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.57 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
85 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
165.2 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.7 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 1.6µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
25h 23m
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 30m 9s
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.01 W/kg Body: 1.43 W/kg
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
@ Flipkart
|
₹15,745
@ Amazon
|