|
78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE
₹15,900
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G42 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE
Comparing the Moto G42 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G42 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE runs at 2.05 GHz, making Moto G42 the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE offers a screen size of 6.43 inches, while Moto G42 offers 6.4 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE features a Super AMOLED display compared to Moto G42's AMOLED, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Moto G42 offers 50 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE offers 13 MP, making Moto G42 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Moto G42 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Moto G42 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G42 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE
₹15,900
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
11 Jul, 2022
|
31 Aug, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(12,785 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(49,554 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
243,481
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
18h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Aug 31, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
243,481
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
16.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1100 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
411 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.89 %
|
83.53 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.9 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
160.6 mm
|
160.4 mm
|
Width
|
73.4 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.2 mm
|
8.3 mm
|
Weight
|
174.5 grams
|
178.8 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.9 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 1/1.97" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Beautify Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Movie Frame
Macro Video Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 54% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 27m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 8m 31s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 1.2 W/kg
|
Head: 0.857 W/kg Body: 0.856 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|