Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G60 vs OPPO F19s
Comparing the Moto G60 vs OPPO F19s across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G60 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,412, while OPPO F19s scores 1,295, making Moto G60 the better performer.
Display: Moto G60 offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while OPPO F19s offers 6.43 inches, making Moto G60 the larger display of the two. OPPO F19s features a AMOLED display compared to Moto G60's IPS LCD, making OPPO F19s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Moto G60 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while OPPO F19s offers 48 MP, making Moto G60 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G60 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F19s offers 16 MP, making Moto G60 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G60 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while OPPO F19s offers 5000 mAh, making Moto G60 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Moto G60 and OPPO F19s offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Moto G60 and OPPO F19s equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO F19s receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Moto G60 has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Moto G60
₹21,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
27 Apr, 2021
|
27 Sep, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 732G
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
108 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
33W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(80,815 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(12,432 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
241,808
AnTuTu Score
|
209,839
AnTuTu Score
|
|
21h 28m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹21,999
|
₹29,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 27, 2021
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
OS Updates
|
1 Year
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
2 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
241,808
|
209,839
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
32.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.8 %
|
11.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.43 %
|
84.42 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
85 %
|
90.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
169.6 mm
|
160.31 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
73.76 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
7.95 mm
|
Weight
|
225 grams
|
175 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
108 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/1.52" sensor size S5KHM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.7 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view4.71 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Slow Motion
Macro Video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.4µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.48 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
21h 28m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 32m 26s
|
1h 4m 54s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.85 W/kg Body: 1.20 W/kg
|
Head: 0.92 W/kg Body: 0.84 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹21,999
|
₹29,999
|