|
78%
Moto G62 5G
₹18,500
|
72%
realme C55 128GB
₹13,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G62 5G vs realme C55 128GB
Comparing the Moto G62 5G vs realme C55 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G62 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,904, while realme C55 128GB scores 1,415, making Moto G62 5G the better performer.
Display: realme C55 128GB offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Moto G62 5G offers 6.5 inches, making realme C55 128GB the larger display of the two. Both Moto G62 5G and realme C55 128GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme C55 128GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Moto G62 5G offers 50 MP, making realme C55 128GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G62 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme C55 128GB offers 8 MP, making Moto G62 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G62 5G delivers longer battery life with 19h 08m, while realme C55 128GB delivers 10h 28m, making Moto G62 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G62 5G and realme C55 128GB offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Moto G62 5G and realme C55 128GB equally at 7.
User Rating: realme C55 128GB receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G62 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
Moto G62 5G
₹18,500
@ Amazon
|
realme C55 128GB
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
19 Aug, 2022
|
28 Mar, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 695
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Charging
|
33W Super VOOC Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(56,782 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(32,880 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
404,601
AnTuTu Score
|
253,333
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 08m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 28m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,500
|
₹13,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 19, 2022
(Official)
|
Mar 28, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v13
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 560 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 560 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
404,601
|
253,333
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
36.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
27.6 %
|
34.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
680 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
392 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.31 %
|
86.74 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.7 %
|
91.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.8 mm
|
165.6 mm
|
Width
|
73.9 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
7.8 mm
|
Weight
|
184 grams
|
189.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Camera |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Starry Mode |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Charging
|
Yes 33W Super VOOC Charging 100% in 63 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 08m
|
10h 28m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 51m 57s
|
1h 0m 34s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.05 W/kg Body: 1.21 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,500
|
₹13,999
|