|
75%
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G9 Power vs POCO M2 Pro
Comparing the Moto G9 Power vs POCO M2 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,807, while Moto G9 Power scores 1,408, making POCO M2 Pro the better performer.
Display: Moto G9 Power offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while POCO M2 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making Moto G9 Power the larger display of the two. Both Moto G9 Power and POCO M2 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while POCO M2 Pro offers 48 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Moto G9 Power and POCO M2 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G9 Power delivers longer battery life with 28h 44m, while POCO M2 Pro delivers 18h 37m, making Moto G9 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G9 Power and POCO M2 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Moto G9 Power is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Moto G9 Power has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
15 Dec, 2020
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 662
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(32,482 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(250,224 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
169,608
AnTuTu Score
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
|
28h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,990
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Stock
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
169,608
|
276,927
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
21.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
61.4 %
|
11.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
263 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.31 %
|
84.62 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
85 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
172.1 mm
|
165.7 mm
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
76.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.6 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
221 grams
|
209 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Macro Video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
28h 44m
|
18h 37m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
3h 48m 56s
|
2h 49m 19s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.98 W/kg Body: 1.33 W/kg
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,990
|