|
68%
Nokia 2.4
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
74%
realme Narzo 20
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 2.4 vs realme Narzo 20
Comparing the Nokia 2.4 vs realme Narzo 20 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 20 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,282, while Nokia 2.4 scores 479, making realme Narzo 20 the better performer.
Display: Both Nokia 2.4 and realme Narzo 20 offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 20 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Nokia 2.4 offers 13 MP, making realme Narzo 20 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 20 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Nokia 2.4 offers 5 MP, making realme Narzo 20 better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme Narzo 20 delivers longer battery life with 19h 16m, while Nokia 2.4 delivers 15h 36m, making realme Narzo 20 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Nokia 2.4 and realme Narzo 20 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 20 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Nokia 2.4 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 20 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Nokia 2.4 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Nokia 2.4
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 20
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
04 Dec, 2020
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(1,479 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(529,865 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
15h 36m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
204,495
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
204,495
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
33.0 s
|
37.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
9.4 %
|
24.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.61 %
|
81.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
88.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.85 mm
|
164.5 mm
|
Width
|
76.3 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.69 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
189 grams
|
208 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view26 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 36m
|
19h 16m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 9m 23s
|
3h 22m 6s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.73 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|