|
63%
Nokia C12 Plus
₹7,999
(Not Released in India)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia C12 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Nokia C12 Plus vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Nokia C12 Plus runs at 1.6 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Nokia C12 Plus offers 6.3 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Nokia C12 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Nokia C12 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Nokia C12 Plus and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Nokia C12 Plus offers 4000 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Nokia C12 Plus offers 32 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
Nokia C12 Plus
₹7,999
(Not Released in India)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
63%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
10 Apr, 2024
|
30 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc SC9863A1
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v15
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc SC9863A1
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
28 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Thickness
|
N/A
|
8.49 mm
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|