|
80%
Nubia Red Magic 3S
₹39,999
(Out of Stock)
|
79%
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nubia Red Magic 3S vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
Comparing the Nubia Red Magic 3S vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,792, while Nubia Red Magic 3S scores 2,542, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better performer.
Display: Nubia Red Magic 3S offers a screen size of 6.65 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers 6.39 inches, making Nubia Red Magic 3S the larger display of the two. Both Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while Nubia Red Magic 3S offers 16 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 45m, while Nubia Red Magic 3S delivers 10h 50m, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Nubia Red Magic 3S and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Nubia Red Magic 3S has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Nubia Red Magic 3S
₹39,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
17 Oct, 2019
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 855 Plus
|
Snapdragon 855
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.96 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.84 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.65 inches (16.89 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
27W Quick Charging
|
Quick Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(214 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(90,160 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
484,670
AnTuTu Score
|
373,945
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 45m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 17, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.96 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Octa core
2.84 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 640
|
Adreno 640
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
484,670
|
373,945
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
13.0 s
|
12.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.65 inches (16.89 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
388 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.37 %
|
85.9 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
171.7 mm
|
156.7 mm
|
Width
|
78.5 mm
|
74.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.6 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
215 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.751/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 27W Quick Charging v4.0
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0 58% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 50m
|
13h 45m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 33m 34s
|
1h 12m 46s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.72 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|