|
72%
OPPO A31 2020
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
Samsung Galaxy M31
₹17,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO A31 2020 vs Samsung Galaxy M31
Comparing the OPPO A31 2020 vs Samsung Galaxy M31 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both OPPO A31 2020 and Samsung Galaxy M31 run at the same processing speed of 2.3 GHz.
Display: OPPO A31 2020 offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M31 offers 6.4 inches, making OPPO A31 2020 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO A31 2020's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M31 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M31 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while OPPO A31 2020 offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M31 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy M31 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO A31 2020 offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M31 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M31 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while OPPO A31 2020 offers 4230 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M31 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both OPPO A31 2020 and Samsung Galaxy M31 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy M31 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while OPPO A31 2020 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
OPPO A31 2020
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M31
₹17,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
28 Feb, 2020
|
04 Mar, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4230 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(80,343 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(11,661 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
103,730
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
16h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 28, 2020
(Official)
|
Mar 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
103,730
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.43 %
|
83.92 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
163.9 mm
|
159.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.5 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.86" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.826 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera25 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @240 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size Exmor RS 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4230 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 33 Hours(3G) / Up to 45 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 48 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 00m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 24m 28s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.383 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|