|
74%
OPPO A52 4GB RAM
₹13,999
(Discontinued)
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,825
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO A52 4GB RAM vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the OPPO A52 4GB RAM vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,961, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM scores 1,344, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers 6.5 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. OPPO A52 4GB RAM features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making OPPO A52 4GB RAM the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO A52 4GB RAM offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 8 MP, making OPPO A52 4GB RAM better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO A52 4GB RAM delivers longer battery life with 17h 39m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making OPPO A52 4GB RAM the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both OPPO A52 4GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while OPPO A52 4GB RAM is rated 7.
User Rating: OPPO A52 4GB RAM receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
OPPO A52 4GB RAM
₹13,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,825
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
21 Jun, 2020
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Snapdragon 665 vs Dimensity 6300 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(51,568 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(11,258 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
182,558
AnTuTu Score
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹15,825
@ Amazon
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
182,558
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
37.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
9.6 %
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.4 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
162 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.5 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.84.05 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.64 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 39m
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 31m 39s
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.42 W/kg Body: 1.12 W/kg
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹15,825
@ Amazon
|