|
73%
OPPO A53 2020
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
77%
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO A53 2020 vs realme Narzo 20 Pro
Comparing the OPPO A53 2020 vs realme Narzo 20 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 20 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,633, while OPPO A53 2020 scores 1,146, making realme Narzo 20 Pro the better performer.
Display: Both OPPO A53 2020 and realme Narzo 20 Pro offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 20 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while OPPO A53 2020 offers 13 MP, making realme Narzo 20 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both OPPO A53 2020 and realme Narzo 20 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OPPO A53 2020 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 4500 mAh, making OPPO A53 2020 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both OPPO A53 2020 and realme Narzo 20 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 20 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 7 from the editorial team, while OPPO A53 2020 is rated 6.
User Rating: OPPO A53 2020 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while realme Narzo 20 Pro has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO A53 2020
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
25 Aug, 2020
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
65W Super Dart Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
6.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(87,573 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(112,162 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
126,129
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
15h 13m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
126,129
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
32.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
31.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.87 %
|
83.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.2 %
|
90.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.9 mm
|
162.3 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera6x Digital Zoomf/2.2 Wide Angle 81.3° field-of-view25 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
6 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 65W Super Dart Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 13m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 29m 9s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.77 W/kg Body: 0.97 W/kg
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.934 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|