|
75%
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB
₹17,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB
Comparing the OPPO F11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,495, while OPPO F11 Pro scores 5,900, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB the better performer.
Display: OPPO F11 Pro offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 6.3 inches, making OPPO F11 Pro the larger display of the two. OPPO F11 Pro features a TFT LTPS display compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB's IPS LCD, making OPPO F11 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO F11 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: OPPO F11 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 13 MP, making OPPO F11 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB delivers longer battery life with 14h 01m, while OPPO F11 Pro delivers 10h 55m, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: OPPO F11 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB offers 128 GB, making OPPO F11 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO F11 Pro is rated 7.
User Rating: OPPO F11 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB both receive the same user rating of 4.5.
|
✕
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro 128GB
₹17,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
15 Mar, 2019
|
10 Apr, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
TFT LTPS
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
13 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
Quick Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(138,384 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(321,339 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
149,995
AnTuTu Score
|
181,423
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 01m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Apr 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
149,995
|
181,423
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
12.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
23.3 %
|
34.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT LTPS
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.31 %
|
81.21 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.9 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
161.3 mm
|
159.2 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.17 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.41 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(3G) / Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 55m
|
14h 01m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 9m 53s
|
1h 25m 33s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.323 W/kg Body: 0.922 W/kg
|
Head: 0.962 W/kg Body: 0.838 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|