|
76%
OPPO F15
₹18,989
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F15 vs vivo S1 Pro
Comparing the OPPO F15 vs vivo S1 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F15 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,430, while vivo S1 Pro scores 1,369, making OPPO F15 the better performer.
Display: OPPO F15 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo S1 Pro offers 6.38 inches, making OPPO F15 the larger display of the two. vivo S1 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO F15's AMOLED, making vivo S1 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO F15 and vivo S1 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo S1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F15 offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo S1 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 23m, while OPPO F15 delivers 7h 24m, making vivo S1 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both OPPO F15 and vivo S1 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both OPPO F15 and vivo S1 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO F15 and vivo S1 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO F15
₹18,989
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
16 Jan, 2020
|
04 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(28,485 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(38,771 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
195,381
AnTuTu Score
|
172,519
AnTuTu Score
|
|
7h 24m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 16, 2020
(Official)
|
Jan 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
195,381
|
172,519
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
28.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
46.0 %
|
22.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
430 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
411 ppi
|
404 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.21 %
|
83.39 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.7 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.2 mm
|
159.2 mm
|
Width
|
73.3 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
172 grams
|
186.7 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.794.71 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
5 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.54 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
7h 24m
|
13h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 1m 23s
|
1h 40m 3s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.20 W/kg Body: 0.55 W/kg
|
Head: 1.191 W/kg Body: 0.475 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|