|
77%
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
₹18,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F17 Pro vs OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
Comparing the OPPO F17 Pro vs OPPO Reno 2F 256GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F17 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB runs at 2.1 GHz, making OPPO F17 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 6.43 inches, making OPPO Reno 2F 256GB the larger display of the two. OPPO F17 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO Reno 2F 256GB's AMOLED, making OPPO F17 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO F17 Pro and OPPO Reno 2F 256GB feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both OPPO F17 Pro and OPPO Reno 2F 256GB feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OPPO F17 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 4015 mAh, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers 4000 mAh, making OPPO F17 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while OPPO F17 Pro offers 128 GB, making OPPO Reno 2F 256GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO Reno 2F 256GB receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO F17 Pro has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
OPPO F17 Pro
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
₹18,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
02 Sep, 2020
|
19 Aug, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP + 2 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4015 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(32,184 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(82,501 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
199,917
AnTuTu Score
|
186,219
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
199,917
|
186,219
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.8 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
800 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.5 %
|
84.38 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.67 %
|
91.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.14 mm
|
161.8 mm
|
Width
|
73.77 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.48 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
164 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2.25" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps 1280x720 @ 240 fps |
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4015 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0
|
Yes VOOC Charging v3.0 51% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 12m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 52m 29s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.437 W/kg Body: 1.410 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|