|
78%
OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G
₹19,986
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G vs vivo T1 44W
Comparing the OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G vs vivo T1 44W across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,758, while vivo T1 44W scores 1,550, making OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G the better performer.
Display: vivo T1 44W offers a screen size of 6.44 inches, while OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G offers 6.43 inches, making vivo T1 44W the larger display of the two. OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo T1 44W's AMOLED, making OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T1 44W offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G offers 48 MP, making vivo T1 44W better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G and vivo T1 44W feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T1 44W delivers longer battery life with 18h 16m, while OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G delivers 14h 25m, making vivo T1 44W the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G and vivo T1 44W offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: vivo T1 44W receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo T1 44W receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO F19 Pro+ 5G
₹19,986
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
25 Mar, 2021
|
05 May, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 800U
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4310 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
50W Flash Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(35,934 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(115,562 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
310,715
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
14h 25m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 25, 2021
(Official)
|
May 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853V
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC3
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
310,715
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.1 %
|
6.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
800 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.94 %
|
84.49 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.80 %
|
90.12 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
160.8 mm
|
Width
|
73.4 mm
|
73.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
173 grams
|
182 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view25 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Bokeh portrait video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4310 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 50W Flash Charging 100% in 48 minutes
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 25m
|
18h 16m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 40m 28s
|
1h 5m 33s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1
TDD N41 / N77 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.161 W/kg Body: 0.730 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|