|
72%
OPPO Reno 2Z
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO Reno 2Z vs vivo V15 Pro
Comparing the OPPO Reno 2Z vs vivo V15 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo V15 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,604, while OPPO Reno 2Z scores 1,489, making vivo V15 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO Reno 2Z offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while vivo V15 Pro offers 6.39 inches, making OPPO Reno 2Z the larger display of the two. vivo V15 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO Reno 2Z's AMOLED, making vivo V15 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO Reno 2Z and vivo V15 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo V15 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO Reno 2Z offers 16 MP, making vivo V15 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo V15 Pro delivers longer battery life with 10h 20m, while OPPO Reno 2Z delivers 8h 07m, making vivo V15 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: OPPO Reno 2Z offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while vivo V15 Pro offers 128 GB, making OPPO Reno 2Z the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo V15 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO Reno 2Z is rated 6.
User Rating: vivo V15 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO Reno 2Z has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO Reno 2Z
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo V15 Pro
₹32,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
06 Sep, 2019
|
06 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P90
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
|
VOOC Charging
|
Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
6.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(8,503 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(40,521 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
217,093
AnTuTu Score
|
181,420
AnTuTu Score
|
|
8h 07m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 06, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 06, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P90
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
217,093
|
181,420
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
16.0 %
|
17.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.38 %
|
85.17 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.1 %
|
91.64 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.8 mm
|
157.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.8 mm
|
74.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
195 grams
|
185 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.74.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size ISO-CELL 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
2 MP
f/2.41.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes VOOC Charging v3.0 51% in 30 minutes
|
Yes Fast Charging 24% in 15 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
8h 07m
|
10h 20m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 13m 1s
|
1h 43m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.183 W/kg Body: 0.780 W/kg
|
Head: 1.155 W/kg Body: 0.284 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
Newspoint Amazon Paytm UC Browser WPS Office
|