|
77%
OPPO Reno 4F
₹21,499
(Not Released in India)
|
80%
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO Reno 4F vs vivo T4X
Comparing the OPPO Reno 4F vs vivo T4X across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo T4X runs at a higher processing speed of 2.5 GHz, while OPPO Reno 4F runs at 2.2 GHz, making vivo T4X the better performer.
Display: vivo T4X offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while OPPO Reno 4F offers 6.43 inches, making vivo T4X the larger display of the two. OPPO Reno 4F features a AMOLED display compared to vivo T4X's LCD, making OPPO Reno 4F the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T4X offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while OPPO Reno 4F offers 48 MP, making vivo T4X better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO Reno 4F offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while vivo T4X offers 8 MP, making OPPO Reno 4F better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo T4X offers a higher battery capacity with 6500 mAh, while OPPO Reno 4F offers 4000 mAh, making vivo T4X better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both OPPO Reno 4F and vivo T4X offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
|
OPPO Reno 4F
₹21,499
(Not Released in India)
|
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
23 Jan, 2022
|
12 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
| Helio P95 vs Dimensity 7300 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP + 2 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.4/5
(177,939 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
685,052
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 12, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P95
View Details
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
685,052
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
430 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
1050 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1050 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
180 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.6 %
|
86.24 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.67 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
73.7 mm
|
76.30 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.4 mm
|
8.09 mm
|
Weight
|
164 grams
|
204 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 11m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 7m 40s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.985 W/kg Body: 0.936 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|