|
68%
POCO C3
₹7,499
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹9,119
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Comparing the POCO C3 vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi 14C scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,206, while POCO C3 scores 523, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a screen size of 6.88 inches, while POCO C3 offers 6.53 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the larger display of the two. Both POCO C3 and Xiaomi Redmi 14C feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while POCO C3 offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while POCO C3 offers 5 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers a higher battery capacity with 5160 mAh, while POCO C3 offers 5000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while POCO C3 offers 32 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi 14C the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi 14C receives a higher expert rating of 7.7 from the editorial team, while POCO C3 is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO C3 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Redmi 14C has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO C3
₹7,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
₹9,119
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
06 Oct, 2020
|
10 Jan, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G35
|
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Helio G35 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(401,803 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(10,210 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
438,871
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 06, 2020
(Official)
|
Jan 10, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G35
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 1.95 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 613
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
438,871
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
8.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
34.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.08 %
|
84.18 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
171.88 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
77.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.22 mm
|
Weight
|
194 grams
|
205 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Film Camera |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5160 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 37 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 23m 45s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.506 W/kg Body: 0.833 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|