|
77%
POCO F1 256GB
₹19,490
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F1 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
Comparing the POCO F1 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO F1 256GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 9,103, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB scores 1,273, making POCO F1 256GB the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while POCO F1 256GB offers 6.18 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB features a Super AMOLED display compared to POCO F1 256GB's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while POCO F1 256GB offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO F1 256GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers 16 MP, making POCO F1 256GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while POCO F1 256GB offers 4000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB better for longer battery life.
Storage: POCO F1 256GB offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers 128 GB, making POCO F1 256GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO F1 256GB receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO F1 256GB
₹19,490
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
29 Aug, 2018
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 845
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(41,352 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(248,812 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
267,207
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 29, 2018
(Official)
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 630
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
267,207
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
420 nits
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18.7:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.2 %
|
84.02 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
155.5 mm
|
159 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.55" sensor size IMX363 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
N/A
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @240 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 0.9µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 29m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4h 54m 37s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.719 W/kg Body: 0.746 W/kg
|
Head: 0.486 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|