|
77%
POCO M2 Pro
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Infinix Zero 8i
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M2 Pro vs Infinix Zero 8i
Comparing the POCO M2 Pro vs Infinix Zero 8i across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,807, while Infinix Zero 8i scores 1,680, making POCO M2 Pro the better performer.
Display: Infinix Zero 8i offers a screen size of 6.85 inches, while POCO M2 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making Infinix Zero 8i the larger display of the two. Both POCO M2 Pro and Infinix Zero 8i feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro and Infinix Zero 8i feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro and Infinix Zero 8i feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO M2 Pro delivers longer battery life with 18h 37m, while Infinix Zero 8i delivers 13h 15m, making POCO M2 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO M2 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Zero 8i offers 128 GB, making POCO M2 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Infinix Zero 8i is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO M2 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Infinix Zero 8i has a rating of 4.2.
|
POCO M2 Pro
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Infinix Zero 8i
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
03 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G90T
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.85 inches (17.4 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP + 8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(250,224 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(7,159 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
291,302
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 15m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 03, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
XOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio G90T
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
276,927
|
291,302
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
57.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.85 inches (17.4 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
392 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.62 %
|
87.04 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
168.7 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
9 mm
|
Weight
|
209 grams
|
210.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.79 |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Macro Video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle 105° field-of-view Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 37m
|
13h 15m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 49m 19s
|
1h 33m 32s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
Head: 0.399 W/kg Body: 0.954 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|