|
77%
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
|
77%
OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
₹18,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M2 Pro vs OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
Comparing the POCO M2 Pro vs OPPO Reno 2F 256GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M2 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB runs at 2.1 GHz, making POCO M2 Pro the better performer.
Display: POCO M2 Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers 6.5 inches, making POCO M2 Pro the larger display of the two. OPPO Reno 2F 256GB features a AMOLED display compared to POCO M2 Pro's IPS LCD, making OPPO Reno 2F 256GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro and OPPO Reno 2F 256GB feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both POCO M2 Pro and OPPO Reno 2F 256GB feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO M2 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers 4000 mAh, making POCO M2 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: POCO M2 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while OPPO Reno 2F 256GB offers 256 GB, making POCO M2 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO Reno 2F 256GB receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while POCO M2 Pro has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
POCO M2 Pro
₹16,990
@ Flipkart
|
✕
OPPO Reno 2F 256GB
₹18,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
14 Jul, 2020
|
19 Aug, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(250,224 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(82,501 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
276,927
AnTuTu Score
|
186,219
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,990
|
Not Available in any store
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 14, 2020
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
276,927
|
186,219
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
11.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.62 %
|
84.38 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.7 mm
|
161.8 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
209 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7926 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2.25" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.41/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Macro Video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.5 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Yes VOOC Charging v3.0 51% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 37m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 49m 19s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.914 W/kg Body: 0.669 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹16,990
|
Not Available in any store
|