|
78%
POCO M4 Pro
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
74%
realme C35
₹13,990
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO M4 Pro vs realme C35
Comparing the POCO M4 Pro vs realme C35 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,828, while realme C35 scores 1,307, making POCO M4 Pro the better performer.
Display: realme C35 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while POCO M4 Pro offers 6.43 inches, making realme C35 the larger display of the two. POCO M4 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to realme C35's IPS LCD, making POCO M4 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO M4 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while realme C35 offers 50 MP, making POCO M4 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO M4 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme C35 offers 8 MP, making POCO M4 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both POCO M4 Pro and realme C35 offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both POCO M4 Pro and realme C35 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: realme C35 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while POCO M4 Pro has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
POCO M4 Pro
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme C35
₹13,990
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
28 Feb, 2022
|
12 Mar, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Unisoc T616
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
0.3 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(188,175 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(199,878 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
309,983
AnTuTu Score
|
187,040
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,990
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 28, 2022
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Unisoc T616
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MP1
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
309,983
|
187,040
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
28.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
600 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
400 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.64 %
|
84.62 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.8 mm
|
164.4 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
75.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
179.5 grams
|
189 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 77° field-of-view26.8 mm focal length 1/2.7" sensor size S5KJN1 ISO-CELL 0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera21.88 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
0.3 MP
f/2.8 Depth Camera36.14 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Short Video Mode
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size Exmor RS 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 17m 57s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.855 W/kg Body: 0.853 W/kg
|
Head: 1.194 W/kg Body: 1.130 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,990
|